The "4-color" palette is the standard 4-color ink jet palette.
In the "6-color" palette, I duplicated the magenta and cyan colors and reduced the duplicates' intensities by half. I believe this is similar to Epson's 6-color printers, except of course I cannot be sure that their additional colors' intensities are exactly half of those of the original colors.
Suppose we can choose whatever ink colors we want to. What is the best result? Heckbert's median cut algorithm is widely considered to be the optimal method. The "optimal 6-color" palette was chosen by searching for six colors using Heckbert's algorithm. This palette uses the same number of ink wells, viz. six, as the "6-color" palette.
The "RGB 4-color" palette is simply one with the primary colors and black.
|
|
| Original "true color" image. It was digitized to 8-bits per color and contains 26,066 distinct colors. | Quantized to "RGB 4-color" palette. |
|
|
| Quantized to "CMYK 4-color" palette. | Quantized to "CcMmYK 6-color" palette. |
|
|
| Quantized to "Optimal 6-color" palette. No halftoning was performed. | Quantized to "Optimal 6-color" palette. |
For this particular image, the palette chosen using Heckbert's algorithm did not perform well. The "arbitrary" palettes (CMYK, RGBK, etc.) did better.
The "6-color" palette did better than the "4-color" palette. Six colors can cover more of the color space. This can in fact translate to better spatial resolution. Consider the almost vertical left edge of the bottom-most petal. The "CcMmYK" output is better defined than the "CMYK" or "RGBK" output. The other petals, most notably the second outermost one from the left, appear sharper. Also, the faint vertical streak near the upper left corner is an out of focus banana plant trunk. The "CcMmYK" halftone rendered that better than the other two.
| Henry Chu 3.II.2000 |